|The World According to Nick|
|My take on Software, Technology, Politics, and anything else I feel like talking about.|
Monday, August 01, 2005
I'll admit, I'm torn over this whole thing. New York Governor Pataki is planning to veto a bill which would make the "morning after pill" available over the counter:
In probably the one major difference between me, and mainstream libertarianism, I am generally against abortion. I view it as a life that's being taken, and see it as a pretty open and shut case as I've said here many times. Now then, is this truly an abortion? Is a life being destroyed here? The earlier and earlier in the pregnancy timeline we go... the more foolish the arguments do become. It's a debate I have with myself every now and then, and I honestly don't have an answer. At some point if we keep looking earlier and earlier, masturbation ought to become illegal then... you're wasting sperm after all. Where do we draw the line? That's a whole other question, for a whole different post.
On to this post then. The arguments made in the case of the morning after pill are always, always couched in terms of the abortion debate. But I have some non-abortion related questions to raise here. I know... It's shocking that I would dare do such a thing. First of all, my understanding is that these drugs are really just super powerful birth control pills. So if birth control pills require a prescription (presumably for safety reasons), why would you make a much stronger pill available over the counter? And how can people advocate with a straight face making this drug available over the counter when some states are trying to require a prescription for Sudafed?
I also find it interesting that people who thing that minors shouldn't be allowed to smoke until they're 18, and drink until they're 21, and probably want to increase the driving age, think that they can make birth control decisions on their own. Well... let's be honest here. They don't ever want you to smoke or drink, but go ahead and take a super hyped up birth control pill that the FDA hasn't yet approved to be over the counter anyway.
I guess my point is that the hypocrisy on both sides astounds me. I suppose I should be used to it by now.
I don't believe that suppressing medical technology -- including controversial medications like Plan B and RU-486 -- is a valid thing, but OTOH, I don't think Plan B should be available without at least a doctor's or, at the very least, nurse's visit. Walk-in centers are everywhere. It's not that hard to go to one.Post a Comment
Home: Wauwatosa, WI, United States
I'm a Software Consultant in the Milwaukee area. Among various geeky pursuits, I'm also an amateur triathlete, and enjoy rock climbing. I also like to think I'm a political pundit.
View My Profile
Previous PostsCongressional Rule Number One
Some Revolutions Aren't Supposed To Be Legislated
Can I Have That Job?
They Need Protest Babes
What's Not Being Said
You Do Watch Battlestar Don't You?
It's Called a Raspberry
Is That Honestly What This Is All About?
Dear God What Next?
Why Hillary Won't Be President
Personal LinksCarnival of the Badger
The Coding Monkey
Blog Critics Reviews
Design By maystar