The World According to Nick
My take on Software, Technology, Politics, and anything else I feel like talking about.
Monday, June 28, 2004

Who's Worse? 

Who's worse? The person who says something awful, or the person who points out what they said? I've mentioned many times before how I don't watch network news anymore. I happened to be surfing the channels, and saw a teaser on NBC Nightly News about a piece they were going to do about Hitler Ads during campaigning. Knowing what ads they were referring to, I decided to stick around to see how they spun it. I wasn't disappointed. As it turns out, Newsweek has this article on the subject posted on MSNBC's website. The article, and the Nightly News piece are almost identical.

Read the article. It's not surprising that Newsweek and NBC have chosen to spin the article as a "Shame on Bush" piece. Watch the ad. All the ad does is show a montage of Democratic rhetoric and quote Democrats. So why is the attention being pointed to the Bush Campaign? If the Democrats are the one's who originally said this, shouldn't the attention be on them? The first paragraph in the Newsweek article says:

On Friday, Democrats and Republicans went to war over a new Bush reelection campaign ad that uses images of Adolph Hitler in bashing Democrat John Kerry.

This makes it seem as if the Bush campaign initiated it. In fact, an ultra-left wing website aired an ad comparing Bush to Hitler. It isn't until later in the article that this is revealed., a left-wing political fundraising group, immediately objected. "We never sponsored those [Hitler] ads, we didn't condone them," says Eli Pariser, executive director of MoveOn PAC. keeps saying that it removed the Hitler ad after there were complaints. Why was it there in the first place? The very act of placing the ad on their website condones the ad.

Where is the interview with Al Gore asking why he referred to Republican's as Brown Shirts? Why instead is there a shot of Kerry being outraged over Bush's ad? The fact of the matter is that the Democrats are ashamed of their behavior. They would like simply to be able to shout their rhetoric to their party contributors who are receptive, and have nobody else hear what they say. NBC and Newsweek should not let them get away with this. If you say something in public, even just to your contributors, that's it. It's in the public domain. If you don't want your awful words repeated by people because you are ashamed of them... then how about not saying them in the first place? Are these your beliefs and opinions or aren't they? Is the entire Democratic Party two faced?


Post a Comment

Related Links:

About Me

Name: Nick
Home: Wauwatosa, WI, United States

I'm a Software Consultant in the Milwaukee area. Among various geeky pursuits, I'm also an amateur triathlete, and enjoy rock climbing. I also like to think I'm a political pundit.

 View My Profile

 Home Page

Subscribe to this Feed

Search Archives
Previous Posts
If Its Below a 5, It's Really Not News
Recovering from Saturday
Clippy is Alive
Grouping classes in an assembly
Sitcoms are Short
Fortune Cookies Pt. II
Running in the Wind
This Should Be Interesting
Could Barely Watch TV Last Night
Star Trek and Iraq

Personal Links
Carnival of the Badger
The Coding Monkey Links
Flickr Photos
Blog Critics Reviews

Blogroll Me!

This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Nick_Schweitzer. Make your own badge here.


Blogcritics: news and reviews

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by

Listed on BlogShares

Design By maystar