|The World According to Nick|
|My take on Software, Technology, Politics, and anything else I feel like talking about.|
Monday, May 01, 2006
Celebrity hypocrisy at it's finest:
George Clooney has been an outspoken critic of going into Iraq... so why is he for invading Darfur? Saddam engaged in genocide, torture, and other unthinkable crimes... so what makes Darfur different? I'm not saying that Darfur is not a problem, and that we probably should do more there. What I'm asking is what makes it different than Iraq? If anyone who reads my blog thinks it was wrong to go into Iraq, but that we should go into Dafur, could you explain the reasoning for me? Every article that I've read so far about the Darfur rallies have conveniently forgotten to mention even a word about Iraq.
Post a Comment
Home: Wauwatosa, WI, United States
I'm a Software Consultant in the Milwaukee area. Among various geeky pursuits, I'm also an amateur triathlete, and enjoy rock climbing. I also like to think I'm a political pundit.
View My Profile
Previous PostsMmmmm... Delicious
Ours is a Laissez-Faire Government?!
Bald Eagles Refuse to Move to Milwaukee
Is It The Weekend Yet?
The McBride Flip Flop
Can You Hear Me Now?
Lessons in Stupid Marketing Decisions
Need Something to Gross You Out?
Shhh... Use Your Inside Voice
Is Van Hollen That Desperate Already?
Personal LinksCarnival of the Badger
The Coding Monkey
Blog Critics Reviews
Design By maystar