The World According to Nick |
My take on Software, Technology, Politics, and anything else I feel like talking about. |
Saturday, February 21, 2004
Some thoughts on the Clarett DecisionI know its been a couple weeks since the Federal District court ordered the NFL to make Clarett eligible for the NFL draft... but I finally got around to reading the actual Text of the Decision. Its actually quite long... but its an interesting read. I'm not a lawyer, but I've read enough legal decisions to realize that they actually are written in non-legalize... which is very good I think. However, now that I've read the entire thing, I can definitely say that this Judge is nuts. One of the more interesting parts of the decision is where she explains the fact that the Collective Bargaining Agreement terms regarding the three year rule are not exempt from Anti-Trust law:
Forgive me for asking stupid questions... but isn't the rule directly related to conditions of employment? A condition of employment is that you are out of high school for three years. Eligibility for the draft is essentially a condition to employment... but for some reason she refuses to draw that obvious connection. The NFL says that there are four reasons that the rule is reasonable:
In making her decision, the Judge throws out these very good reasons... stating:
Age is a poor proxy huh? Yet we use age as a proxy for eligibility in a whole matter of issues in our daily lives. You have to be 16 to drive, 18 to smoke, vote, join the armed force, and enter into a binding contract. You even have to wait until you're are 21 to drink. What does age have to do with any of these activities? Absolutely none. We use age as a proxy judgement on maturity for all of these. So shouldn't all these laws be struck down then? You should be able to drive whenever you can pass the driving test. You should have to take a test before you can vote (oh wait... they tried that in the South to prevent blacks from voting... and that was rightly struck down). We use age as a proxy because we can define a very clear demarkation line on eligibility that prevents abuse of more subjective testing means (like the voting example). Sure some younger people may be mature enough to vote before 18 for example... but the point is... its not permanent. Wait a couple years. The same goes for Clarett. Wait a year like everyone else. But of course for him... he screwed up his life so much that he probably won't be able to play college ball next year, which is his real motivation. However, thats his fault, not the NFL's. Wow... this post ended up being a lot longer than I intended... oh well.
|
About Me
Name: Nick Home: Wauwatosa, WI, United States I'm a Software Consultant in the Milwaukee area. Among various geeky pursuits, I'm also an amateur triathlete, and enjoy rock climbing. I also like to think I'm a political pundit. View My Profile Archives
Home PagePrevious Posts
Front-Wheel Drive Cars are like Bad Sex. Rear-Whe...Random Thoughts on Component Based Programming A First Look at ObjectSpaces in Visual Studio "Whi... Exploring New WinForm Controls in VS .NET Whidbey Building a Better Binary Search Tree Got a new Cell Phone Who is the "Typical" Visual C# User? Introduction to Anonymous Methods and Higher-Order... Welcome to the World According to Nick Personal Links
Carnival of the Badger
The Coding Monkey del.icio.us Links Flickr Photos Blog Critics Reviews Blogroll Me! music books video culture politics sports gaming www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Nick_Schweitzer. Make your own badge here.
Credits
Design By maystar |