All is not lost however, because the National Governors Association is talking about challenging the law's constitutionality. It's essentially an unfunded mandate that Congress has just pushed on the states. More importantly, it creates a national identity database that is illegal. It very well could make identity theft much easier, and would do very little to actually make us more secure. Instapundit also brings up an excellent point that it may not pass constitutional muster because the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government may not compel states to implement federal regulatory programs, even if its the federal regulation is proper.
I'm reminded of another scene from the Hunt for Red October:
Capt. Vasili Borodin: I will live in Montana. And I will marry a round American woman and raise rabbits, and she will cook them for me. And I will have a pickup truck... maybe even a "recreational vehicle." And drive from state to state. Do they let you do that?
Captain Ramius: I suppose.
Capt. Vasili Borodin: No papers?
Captain Ramius: No papers, state to state.
Not any more Borodin. Now you need identity papers. We're becoming more like the U.S.S.R every day.
Update: The other reason I think Sensenbrenner has gotten too comfy as my congressman is because of these comments he made a month or so ago about the government's right to censor. Just thought I'd bring it up again in case Jim happened to be reading.
The other reason F. James is way too comfy is the last redistricting (2000), 4 Democrats and 4 Republicans taking the time to make sure there'll be 4 Democrats and 4 Republicans for 10 years.
ReplyDelete