Now Google, whose name has become synonymous with internet searching, plans to build a database that will compare the track record and credibility of all news sources around the world, and adjust the ranking of any search results accordingly.
The database will be built by continually monitoring the number of stories from all news sources, along with average story length, number with bylines, and number of the bureaux cited, along with how long they have been in business. Google's database will also keep track of the number of staff a news source employs, the volume of internet traffic to its website and the number of countries accessing the site.
Google will take all these parameters, weight them according to formulae it is constructing, and distil them down to create a single value. This number will then be used to rank the results of any news search.
Personally I find this solution to be very satisfying... as it doesn't use some sort arbitrary (and opinion driven) means to determine what is a valid news source and what is not. It uses practical, measurable criteria to determine a trustworthy news source. Frankly I'm not surprised that they would come up with something like this at all... I'll be interested to see how it turns out.
I just wanted to point out, though you may find it utterly irrelevant, that the name of my blog and yours differ by only 3 letters.
ReplyDeleteI post at The World According To Nome.
So that makes you my doppelganger, or something like it.
Sorry if that was tedious. I will fade away like your ghostly counterpart now.